More from edwired:
The Passing of the Killer App
In a meeting the other day, one of our graduate students observed
that for undergraduate students today, email is a way to get in touch
with old people.
Ouch.
Deeply wounded by this notion, I decided to test this proposition
out with some of the undergraduates I know. Alas, they mostly confirmed
this statement. When I asked them how they mainly stayed in touch with
one another, they said:
Myspace
Facebook
Livejournal
Text messaging
Instant messaging
Phone calls
But email? For the very unscientific sample of students I
spoke to yesterday (five altogether) email was for getting in touch
with professors, staying in touch with parents, or contacting companies
to purchase products, ask for technical support, and so on.
Supporting this notion that younger people are turning toward newer and different ways of staying in touch are the statistics published by Livejournal.com on its website. Livejournal, which bosts only
9.3 million accounts (as compared to the 27 million or so Myspace
users) has a demographic that is largely aged 18-21 and almost
two-thirds female. So, for example, there are ten Livejournal users
aged 18 for every one aged 30 and more than three 18 year-olds for
every 25 year-old. Facebook and Myspace do not publish similar
information on their sites, but given the fact that Facebook users must
have college/university or high school issued email addresses to sign
up, the average Facebook user must be even more heavily weighted to the
18-21 year-old demographic.
What does this mean for history educators--beyond the depression that acceptance of our dinosaur status will induce?
First and foremost it means that we are going to have to start using
these new communication platforms, and fast. Otherwise our students
will be engaging in a dynamic and freewheeling conversation that we
have no access to. But it also means that we are going to have to think
carefully about how educational purposes can be best served in these new platforms. After all, education is what we're good at, isn't it?