Is anonymity killing the Internet? To some computing experts, it might seem that way.
In the wake of Wikipedia's recent struggles,
some commentators have argued that the online encyclopedia is finally
experiencing a phenomenon that has happened on many an online message
board. "In every system that I have seen where anonymity becomes
common, the system fails," writes Kevin Kelly, editor at large of Wired.
But some critics say Wikipedia's problem isn't anonymity; it's lack of accountability.
Web sites like eBay have managed to gain users' trust -- and keep most
members on good behavior -- by adding mechanisms for rating the
performance of anonymous users, according to Bruce Schneier of Wired
News. "History is filled with bandits and pirates who amass reputations
without anyone knowing their real names," he writes. (Wired News)
Posted on January 12, 2006 at 09:27 AM | Permalink
Here's the December 5 article mentioned above that gives more details:
December 05, 2005
After being stung in the past week by a pair of much-discussed
mini-scandals, Wikipedia is about to change the way it does business.
But the popular online encyclopedia won't stray far from its
open-source ideals.
The Web site's founder, Jimmy Wales, says he will soon bar anonymous users
from creating new encyclopedia entries, leaving that job instead to the
site's legion of registered contributors. Wikipedia will still permit
anonymous posters to edit existing articles, though. (CNET News)
The change in policy comes after an ugly week for Wikipedia. First,
a former administrative assistant to Robert F. Kennedy wrote a sharply critical op-ed piece for USA Today,
complaining that a Wikipedia article falsely accused him of having been
a suspect in the Kennedy assassinations. Just two days later, Adam
Curry, a former MTV host often credited with inventing podcasting, was
accused of anonymously editing a Wikipedia entry to minimize the
contributions of other seminal podcasters.
Mr. Wales says that the recent incidents have been exceptions to the
rule, and that Wikipedia maintains a high accuracy rate. But some
commentators are less sanguine about the online resource. Dave Winer, a
blogger whose name reportedly was among those Mr. Curry deleted from a
Wikipedia entry, writes: "Wikipedia is so often considered authoritative. That must stop now, surely." [Editor's note: This entry was corrected, see comments for details]
Posted on December 5, 2005 at 04:13 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/3797860